>
The recent U.S. government shutdown left tens of thousands of planes grounded and travelers scrambling to find last-minute solutions to reach their destinations. Some chose other modes of transportation, such as trains and cars, while the ones who could afford it splurged on private flights.
The reason this was possible has to do with a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) emergency order that required commercial operators to cut flights until the situation is resolved. This move was necessary due to a severe shortage of air traffic controllers and other essential personnel at 40 of the country's biggest airports.
Since private operators typically do not use major airports, they were not as affected. As a result, demand for chartered flights surged.
In this article, Jettly examines how the government shutdown impacted the commercial air travel system and how private aviation was not as affected.
The U.S. commercial flight sector was already understaffed, and the recent government shutdown made things significantly worse. It made it clear that, no matter how big, an airport can’t function without proper funding and staff.
Essential workers, such as air traffic controllers, were mandated to come to work even if they didn’t get paid. However, FAA Administrator Bryan Bedford told journalists that between 20% and 40% of the controllers did not show up for work during this period.
This left key airport facilities critically understaffed, leading to mass delays and flight cancellations that rippled across the National Airspace System (NAS). But travelers and airport workers were not the only ones affected.
Air cargo operations were also disrupted, affecting high-value, time-sensitive goods like electronics and pharmaceuticals. Even after the shutdown ended, experts predict the system will take weeks to stabilize. Planes, pilots, and crews are still out of position, and the underlying ATC shortage remains a major, persistent issue.
At the end of the day, the shutdown showed that the commercial air travel industry's reliability and safety standards are directly tied to the consistent, paid labor of its federal workforce and that years of unaddressed staffing shortages can turn a political impasse into a functional and safety crisis for millions of travelers.
Private jet rental remains a niche service, catering to only a fraction of travelers. During the latest government shutdown, private jet rental companies did register a surge in demand, but this trend is unsustainable in the long term.
Private jet companies operate within the NAS and rely on the FAA ATCs for safe guidance. As long as the staff shortage problem persists, both sectors will suffer.
Some discussions proposed privatizing the ATC. However, experts and industry groups, citing international examples, such as Canada, have argued that privatization can lead to underinvestment in personnel and infrastructure, thereby containing costs but potentially worsening the controller shortage and safety concerns.
Then there’s the capacity issue. Private aviation cannot absorb the demands of commercial travelers. Even if every private jet in the country flew at full capacity, they could not absorb the millions of passengers who were delayed or canceled during the shutdown.
Both sectors need to work together for safety, national connectivity, and economic vitality.
The public sector (government agencies such as the FAA, TSA, and state/local airport authorities) serves most travelers and provides the framework for safety, security, and infrastructure that private aviation also uses.
Private jets can use smaller regional airports that commercial airlines cannot serve, so passengers often land much closer to their final destination, significantly reducing ground travel time.
If the shutdown highlighted anything, it’s that ongoing staffing challenges in air traffic control affect both commercial and private aviation operators nationwide.
Share this post:
Discover tips and trends in the industry.

5
min read
King Air E90 Operating Costs: Budget, Cost per Hour & Charter Alternatives
The Beechcraft King Air E90, a versatile turboprop aircraft, has annual operating costs that can exceed $1.1 million for high-utilization owners flying around 450 hours per year, with costs averaging approximately $2,577 per hour. Key cost drivers include fuel, maintenance, crew salaries, insurance, and hangar fees, with fuel being the largest variable expense. For those flying fewer than 200 hours annually, chartering through platforms like Jettly may be more cost-effective, as it avoids the high fixed costs associated with ownership. Ultimately, the decision between ownership and chartering hinges on expected flight hours and the value placed on aircraft availability and customization.
Read More
5
min read
Private Airplanes Cost: What It Really Takes to Fly, Rent, or Own
Understanding the costs of private airplanes involves three main components: chartering flights, purchasing an aircraft, and ongoing operational expenses. In 2026, charter rates range from approximately $2,000 to over $14,000 per hour, while purchase prices for new jets start at around $3.5 million and can exceed $81 million for ultra-long-range models. Annual operating costs can reach $500,000 to $2 million or more, depending on the aircraft type and usage, making chartering more cost-effective for those flying fewer than 200-250 hours annually. Jettly offers a digital marketplace for on-demand private jet charters, providing transparent pricing and flexibility without the burdens of ownership.
Read MoreStay updated with our latest insights and tips to elevate your journey with us.
MEMBERSHIPS AND ASSOCIATIONS